法律風險告知：反通知的代價

EN: Counter Notice Risk Disclosure: What to Know

範疇：法律與模板｜模板：比較與決策樹

導言 / Intro

對照最清楚：左欄是常見誤解，右欄是能實際過件的作法。把右欄全部做滿，你的通過率與速度自然上來。

Side-by-side clarity: the left lists myths, the right shows methods that pass review. Do the right column to win on speed and success.

常見誤解 vs 可行作法

『標來源＝可用』

『授權或合理使用要件齊備；可驗證證據鏈加分』

‘Attribution = permission’ ‘License or fair-use elements in place; verifiable proof chain adds weight.’

『非商業就安全』

『仍須看目的/使用量/實質性/市場影響』

‘Non-commercial is safe’ ‘Still weigh purpose/amount/substantiality/market harm.’

『只有截圖即可』

『截圖＋HTML 快照＋SHA-256＋IPFS CID＋Polygon TX Hash』

‘Screenshots are enough’ ‘Screenshots + HTML + SHA-256 + IPFS CID + Polygon TX Hash.’

『單通道慢慢等』

『平台＋Cloudflare/Registrar/Registry 並行』

‘Single-channel waiting’ ‘Platforms + Cloudflare/Registrar/Registry in parallel.’

『先恐嚇函』

『先固證再溝通；避免逆風與曝露風險』

‘Scare letter first’ ‘Seal proof, then communicate; reduce blowback & exposure risk.’

FAQ

  1. 為何對照能過件？

    審查人員重視結構化與可驗證訊息—右欄做法就是為此設計。

    Why does comparison help? Reviewers prize structured, verifiable inputs—the right column is built for that.

  2. 是否需要全部同時做？

    依情況裁切，但證據鏈四件式與並行策略是底線。

    Do I need to do all items? Trim per scenario, but the 4-piece proof chain + parallelism is the baseline.

CTA

把右欄變成你的標準流程卡：SUZOO 先固證，再照表單模板逐欄貼入。

Promote the right column into your standard runbook: seal in SUZOO, then paste into form templates field-by-field.

相關主題